Yifeng Xiang, Xi Tang, Changjun Min, Guanghao Rui, Yan Kuai, Fengya Lu, Pei Wang, Hai Ming, Qiwen Zhan, Xiaocong Yuan, Joseph R. Lakowicz, Douguo Zhang
Near‐field optical trapping can be realized with focused evanescent waves that are excited at the water–glass interface due to the total internal reflection, or with focused plasmonic waves excited on the water–gold interface. Herein, the performance of these two kinds of near‐field optical trapping techniques is compared using the same optical microscope configuration. Experimental results show that only a single‐micron polystyrene bead can be trapped by the focused evanescent waves, whereas many beads are simultaneously attracted to the center of the excited region by focused plasmonic waves. This difference in trapping behavior is analyzed from the electric field intensity distributions of these two kinds of focused surface waves and the difference in trapping behavior is attributed to photothermal effects due to the light absorption by the gold film.
DOI
No comments:
Post a Comment